Phyllis Schlafly

Eagle Forum Will Never Burn Our Legacy of Liberty

In his July 10, 2025, commentary, “Calling On The Eagle Forum To Add to Its Legacy of Liberty,” RealClearMarkets Editor John Tamny seeks Eagle Forum’s support of a constitutional convention (aka Con-Con) with the goal of pushing Congress to support term limits for the federal legislature.

Continue reading →
Congress

Emergency! Ask Members to Vote In-Person!

Republican Representative Anna Paulina Luna has filed a discharge petition (with 11 other Republicans) to force the GOP Leadership to vote on a Democrat Resolution that will allow proxy (remote) voting for 12 weeks for any Member if they or their spouse gives birth.

Continue reading →
Constitution of USA

Article V Convention is a Threat to the Electoral College

There is a well-financed movement to circumvent the Electoral College by having State Legislatures pass the National Popular Vote Compact. To date, Sixteen States and the District of Columbia have passed the National Popular Vote Compact representing 205 electoral votes of the 270 votes needed to elect a President and for the National Popular Vote Compact to take effect.

Continue reading →
Phyllis Schlafly Articles

The Article V Convention to Propose Constitutional Amendments: Contemporary Issues for Congress

Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides two methods by which the nation’s founding charter may be amended. The first, Amendment by Congressional Proposal, requires the adoption of an amendment or amendments by a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress; the second, generally referred to as the “Article V Convention” method, authorizes the states to apply to Congress for a convention for proposing an amendment or amendments. If the legislatures of two-thirds of the states, 34 at present, do, in fact, apply for a convention, Congress is obliged to convene one. Both methods then require the approval of three-fourths of the states, 38 at present, in order to become part of the Constitution.

Continue reading →

Mischief-Making about the Constitution

Attacks on the U.S. Constitution are coming from all sides. There are many pressure groups that just don’t like our U.S. Constitution, even though it is the longest lasting Constitution in history and has enabled us to prosper with 43 peaceful changes of government. Back in the 1970s, powerful and highly placed U.S. officials made a strenuous effort to change us into a parliamentary system of government. The global government-oriented Council on Foreign Relations has said that the provision it despises the most is the treaty clause, which requires the vote of two-thirds of Senators to ratify a treaty.

Continue reading →

How Do They Come Up With So Many Bad Ideas?

Moving quietly under cover of presidential debates and the enormous publicity given to the race for the Republican nomination is a plan to change how U.S. Presidents are elected. It would bypass the procedure spelled out in the U.S. Constitution which has been used successfully for over two centuries.

Continue reading →

Good Advice Against a Con Con

Suggestions that the United States call a new constitutional convention, as allowed in the Constitution’s Article V, have popped up in some state legislatures and even on a page in the Wall Street Journal.

Continue reading →
VIDEOS
BURGER LETTERS
Bush, Burger, and Schlafly
Phyllis sworn in as a Member of the Commission on the Bicentennial of the Constitution, July 30, 1985

Letters from retired Chief Justice Warren Burger opposing a Constitutional Convention:

SKOUSEN LETTER
BROCHURES
George Washington, James Madison, and Ben Franklin did a magnificent job of producing our United States Constitution. Washington and Madison both called it a “miracle.” It has lasted over 220 years, protecting our liberty while accommodating our geographic, economic, and population expansion.
“The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance.” — Albert Einstein
Conservativeonline-3-01-11sm
Article V — Repeal Amendment Debate held on March 1, 2011 at the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel, St. Louis, MO.
JAMES MADISON'S WARNING

“You wish to know my sentiments on the project of another general Convention as suggested by New York. I shall give them to you with great frankness . . .3. If a General Convention were to take place for the avowed and sole purpose of revising the Constitution, it would naturally consider itself as having a greater latitude than the Congress appointed to administer and support as well as to amend the system; it would consequently give greater agitation to the public mind; an election into it would be courted by the most violent partizans on both sides; it wd. probably consist of the most heterogeneous characters; would be the very focus of that flame which has already too much heated men of all parties; would no doubt contain individuals of insidious views, who under the mask of seeking alterations popular in some parts but inadmissible in other parts of the Union might have a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very foundations of the fabric. Under all these circumstances it seems scarcely to be presumeable that the deliberations of the body could be conducted in harmony, or terminate in the general good. Having witnessed the difficulties and dangers experienced by the first Convention which assembled under every propitious circumstance, I should tremble for the result of a Second, meeting in the present temper of America, and under all the disadvantages I have mentioned. . . .I am Dr. Sir, Yours Js. Madison Jr”

James Madison letter to George Turberville, 2 November 1788

RESCISSIONS

The following states have rescinded their resolutions calling for a Con Con:

  1. Idaho (1999)
  2. Utah (2001)
  3. North Dakota (2001)
  4. Virginia (2004)
  5. South Carolina (2004)
  6. Wyoming — HEJR0003 (2009)
  7. Missouri — SCR 10 (2009) did not pass
  8. New Hampshire — HCR28 (2010)
  9. Delaware — HCR60 (2016)
  10. Maryland — (2017)
  11. New Mexico — (2017)
  12. Nevada — (2017)
Say NO to Rewriting the U.S. Constitution!