The House has scheduled a vote on an important piece of legislation this week that will protect the integrity of the Supreme Court and ultimately our Republic. H.J.Res. 1, also known as the “Keep 9 Amendment,” is a Constitutional amendment that would simply set the number of Supreme Court justices at nine.
Continue reading →
The Supreme Court has long been in the crosshairs of those who want to degrade our Constitutional values. Some Democrats have advocated expanding the Court in response to recent judicial outcomes they oppose.
Continue reading →
Anne Schlafly told NewsBusters: “Why is The New York Times so reluctant to engage with competing viewpoints on issues like feminism? A publication that prides itself on open debate should be willing to examine whether the promises of modern feminism have matched the lived experiences of women, or whether alternative perspectives deserve a fair hearing.”
Continue reading →
This Fidelity Month, members of Congress are finding ways to stay faithful to our founding principles by upholding the integrity of our nation’s judicial institutions. The Supreme Court, in particular, has long been in the crosshairs of those who want to degrade our Constitutional values.
Continue reading →
Many Americans think of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) as an issue from another era in American history. And so it is – a 22-word amendment to the Constitution first proposed in 1972, fiercely debated, but failing of ratification by the deadlines Congress established, then extended by majority vote, for it.
Continue reading →
On the surface, the Equal Rights Amendment seems quite innocent. The main text states, “Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied by the United States or any state on account of sex.”
Continue reading →
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has proved again why she doesn’t belong on the U.S. Supreme Court. She really doesn’t like our U.S. Constitution, which she swore to uphold and defend, and she probably would like to rewrite it with input from various foreign laws and constitutions.
Continue reading →
The biggest losers in the Obama economy are men rather than women, a fact that is bad for men, for families, for the federal deficit and debt problems, and for the health of the U.S. economy. f
Continue reading →One of the greatest risks of the current Lame Duck Congress is the possibility of Senate confirmation of Obama’s radical appointments to federal courts, boards and agencies.
Continue reading →Barack Obama has thumbed his nose at veterans and many other Americans by trying to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens with the liberal Elena Kagan.
Continue reading →The Democrats and their feminist allies have decided on one of their major goals. It is to increase the number of single moms by increasing the flow of taxpayer-paid incentives that subsidize the non-marriage lifestyle.
Continue reading →Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is credited with writing several feminist precepts into U.S. constitutional law based on the spurious notion that our Constitution is a “living” (i.e., re-interpretable) document, she now wants to expand that process to welcome foreign law.
Continue reading →
