This Fidelity Month, members of Congress are finding ways to stay faithful to our founding principles by upholding the integrity of our nation’s judicial institutions. The Supreme Court, in particular, has long been in the crosshairs of those who want to degrade our Constitutional values.
Continue reading →
A group of 48 Democrat U.S. Senators have called on President Joe Biden to order the Archivist to “certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution before he leaves office next month.
Continue reading →
A coalition of feminist and transgender groups is turning to Congress to breathe new life into the twice-dead Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).
Continue reading →
For anyone who might have entertained the thought long, long ago that the Equal Rights Amendment was about women’s rights, the Senate’s hearing this week should prove it was not. The ERA is being revisited because of the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade. Radical leftists will not stop in their efforts to institutionalize abortion rights, and they see the ERA as perfect cover.
Continue reading →
March 23, 2021 Senate Advancing Equal Rights Amendment Just over a week after House Democrats passed their resolution to remove the deadline of the Equal
Continue reading →
Autumn Schimmer March 16th, 2021 SFLAction notes that the ERA is a scored vote The leaders tell Congress: “Almost 100 years after it was first proposed, the pleasant-sounding Equal
Continue reading →
It is clear Virginia Democrats have failed to consider the consequences to both women and the state in their haste to pass the ERA — Anne Schlafly Cori, Eagle Forum Chairman
Continue reading →
The vague, poorly written language of the ERA does not allow any distinction to be made between men and women – even when it makes
Continue reading →Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) proponents have been misleading the public about the purpose and consequences of the ERA for close to 50 years! Their current
Continue reading →
Amending our U.S. Constitution is a big deal and should not be done lightly. The amending process requires a super-majority — not a simple majority — of both houses of Congress, plus a super-majority of the individual states to agree on the same language.
Continue reading →![Opponents of the Equal Rights Amendment, led by Phyllis Schlafly, center, white coat, march in front of the White House Friday. The group, about 200 strong, were protesting Rosalyn Carter's campaign for ERA from the executive mansion. [AP]](https://eagleforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/PS-ERA-WhiteHouse2.webp)
Read the full text that Tampa Bay Times would not print! To the Editor: The Tampa Bay Times just endorsed the Equal Rights Amendment. But
Continue reading →
At the Democratic presidential debates this week, several of the candidates said that ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment was a top priority.
Continue reading →Many Americans think of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) as an issue from another era in American history. And so it is – a 22-word amendment to the Constitution first proposed in 1972, fiercely debated, but failing of ratification by the deadlines Congress established, then extended by majority vote, for it.
Continue reading →The Equal Rights Amendment is a poorly worded proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would restrict all laws and practices that make any distinctions based on gender or sex. While we believe in equal opportunity for men and women, we also recognize that there are situations where we must make distinctions based on our biological differences. It is foolish to deny biology in pursuit of “equality.” If the ERA ever becomes part of our constitution, men and women could not be treated differently, even if the different treatment is due to physical differences such as pregnancy.
Continue reading →
The National Bureau of Economic Research released a study to be published soon in the American Economic Journal that shows women’s happiness has measurably declined since 1970. It’s no surprise that this has stimulated much comment.
Continue reading →“Juno,” which won an Academy Award for best original screenplay, is a movie sure to delight the feminists. The script answers No to the question posed in the title of Maureen Dowd’s book, “Are Men Necessary?”
Continue reading →
Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →Cut taxes across-the-board to put money in the pockets of all taxpayers. Cut rates — the proven way to keep the economy moving. Americans are overtaxed.
Continue reading →The polls are now all reporting that “feminism” is a negative word. Women absolutely do not want to be called feminists.
Continue reading →
The weekend of November 18-21, 1977, in Houston was the decisive turning point in the war between Women’s Lib and those who are Pro-Family. “Houston” was the “Midway” battle that determined which is the winning side.
Continue reading →