A revised and expanded edition of Phyllis Schlafly’s book, The Supremacists: The Tyranny of Judges and How To Stop It was published this month by Spence Publishing Company and is available for immediate shipment.
Continue reading →
Some Republicans, from senators to the new chief justice, are falling for the seductive goals of consensus and bipartisanship. More often than not, those words mean abandonment of principle.
Continue reading →A new conservative uprising is stirring and no one should be surprised. The Republican Establishment has been drifting leftward, and a backlash had to come against the Big Government spenders in legislatures and against supremacist judges who order the spending.
Continue reading →The most controversial case for the new Roberts-Alito Supreme Court this term does not concern abortion, gay rights, the death penalty, or even the detention of enemy combatants.
Continue reading →One of the most outrageous current examples of out-of-control judges is the case called Flores v. Arizona, now pending in federal court in Tucson, Arizona. Originally filed in 1992, plaintiff lawyers claim to represent an estimated 160,000 children of illegal aliens attending public schools.
Continue reading →One of the Senators’ lines of questioning of Judge Samuel Alito that lacked follow-up concerned the power of Congress to define the jurisdiction of federal courts.
Continue reading →When the feminist movement burst onto the American social scene in the 1970s, the rallying cry was “liberation.” The feminists demanded liberation from the role of the housewife and mother who lived in what Betty Friedan famously labeled a “comfortable concentration camp.”
Continue reading →
Judge John E. Jones III could still be Chairman of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board if millions of evangelical Christians had not pulled the lever for George W. Bush in 2000. Yet this federal judge, who owes his position entirely to those voters and the Bush who appointed him, stuck the knife in the backs of those who brought him to the dance in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Continue reading →Federal judges have just hit parents with a triple-whammy. Two appellate courts held that parents have no right to stop offensive, privacy-invading interrogation of their own children in public schools, and in a third case the Supreme Court indicated that it is not going to do anything to protect parents’ rights concerning schools.
Continue reading →When Hillary Clinton proclaimed that it takes a village to raise a child, many people didn’t realize that she was enunciating liberal dogma that the government should raise and control children.
Continue reading →When Hillary Clinton proclaimed that it takes a village to raise a child, many people didn’t realize that she was enunciating liberal dogma that the government should raise and control children.
Continue reading →Howard Fineman of Newsweek looked into his crystal ball and proclaimed the coming crackup of the conservative movement.
Continue reading →If John G. Roberts’ confirmation hearing is any guide, we won’t learn anything from Harriet Miers’ confirmation hearing.
Continue reading →The histrionics of the liberals about the impending nomination to fill the Supreme Court vacancy look overwrought, but they are heartfelt. The liberals know they’ve lost the legislative and executive branches of government, and their only hope of achieving their goals is from supremacist judges who claim the authority to legislate the law of the land.
Continue reading →William Rehnquist was the most unlikely of appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Continue reading →Hypocrisy stands at the pinnacle of the sins that the liberals most disdain. So it’s fair game to compare the free ride they gave to Ruth Bader Ginsburg with their searching the archives to pillory every word ever written by Supreme Court nominee John Roberts.
Continue reading →The histrionics of the liberals about the impending nomination to fill the Supreme Court vacancy look overwrought, but they are heartfelt.
Continue reading →The Supreme Court wrapped up one of its most disappointing terms in years. Plagued by Chief Justice Rehnquist’s absence due to illness, the other justices behaved like the gang that cannot shoot straight.
Continue reading →Five activist justices (not even nine) imposed their personal social preference on every American voter, state legislator, congressman, and juror. Adding insult to injury, the supremacist five used foreign laws, “international opinion,” and even an unratified treaty to rationalize overturning more than 200 years of American law and history!
Continue reading →A recent small gathering of conservatives who dared to criticize judicial supremacists has caused an outpouring of paranoia among liberals and others who want judges to make the major social and political decisions of our times.
Continue reading →The courts so purposely humiliated Congress in the Terri Schiavo case that some Representatives are finally beginning to talk back. Unelected judges have flagrantly abused the legislative and executive functions of government for so many years that we wonder why a reaction has taken this long.
Continue reading →Florida Probate Judge George Greer has taken judicial supremacy to new abuses in ordering the starvation of an innocent woman against the will of her parents, her brother, her church, thousands of volunteers, and, as far as we know, herself. We wouldn’t permit anyone to treat a dog this way.
Continue reading →“By what conceivable warrant can nine lawyers presume to be the authoritative conscience of the Nation?” So asked an incredulous Justice Antonin Scalia in response to the latest outrage by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Continue reading →Traditionally Republican Kansas, of all places, is the latest battleground in the judges’ grab for supremacy over the other branches of government.
Continue reading →
