
Ashcroft Stands Up To The Abortionists
Abortion has been legal for over thirty years, yet little is publicly known about the practices of this billion-dollar industry.
Continue reading →
Abortion has been legal for over thirty years, yet little is publicly known about the practices of this billion-dollar industry.
Continue reading →
The opening blast in a campaign to require the federal courts to operate within their authorized jurisdiction was unveiled last week in Montgomery, Alabama under the title the Constitution Restoration Act.
Continue reading →
The constitutional issues involved in NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), passed a decade ago, have just ascended the ladder to the U.S. Supreme Court. Arguments will be heard this spring on whether the non-U.S. tribunals created by NAFTA can require our government to violate federal law in order to comply with foreign rulings.
Continue reading →
Are there things about our country and our culture you want to change? Activist judges? Same-sex marriage? Protecting the Pledge of Allegiance? Political bias in universities? Public school curriculum? Taxes? Pornography on television?
Continue reading →
Finally, we have a President who comes right out and targets “activist judges” as the enemy of traditional values and urges us to use “the constitutional process” to remedy the problem.
Continue reading →
Despite George W. Bush’s high poll numbers, the Democrats think they have the key to winning the 2004 elections. Get the votes of convicted felons.
Continue reading →
When President Bush unveiled his “temporary foreign workers” plan, he got cheers from his carefully selected invitees in the East Room of the White House, but he’s getting jeers from everyone else from Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) to Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA).
Continue reading →
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge’s shocking words were a broadside attack on current law: “We have to come to grips with the presence of 8 to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal status some way.”
Continue reading →
In a 4-3 decision released November 18, the court acknowledged that for three centuries Massachusetts defined civil marriage as stated in Black’s Law Dictionary: “the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.”
Continue reading →
Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →
Since the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriages in Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health, reporters have been asking presidential candidates for their comment.
Continue reading →
Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →
President Bush has proclaimed the week of October 12-18 as Marriage Protection Week because it’s becoming clearer all the time that the institution of marriage needs protection against battering by the courts.
Continue reading →
Federal court decisions banning the Pledge of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments, and the possibility raised in Lawrence v. Texas that marriage may no longer be defined as the union of a man and a woman, show that the time has come to curb the Imperial Judiciary.
Continue reading →
by Phyllis Schlafly The secularists are gloating. They got a court order to remove the Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama courthouse and another court
Continue reading →
Federal court decisions about the Pledge of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments , and the specter raised in Lawrence v. Texas that marriage may no longer be defined as the union of a man and a woman, show that the time has come to curb the Imperial Judiciary.
Continue reading →
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently joined Hillary Clinton, Janet Reno, anti-Pledge-of-Allegiance Judge Stephen Reinhardt, and other like-mined liberals and feminists to launch a new organization called the American Constitution Society.
Continue reading →
Globalism also means bending the United States Constitution into conformity with opinions of foreigners who pompously enunciate new laws and new human rights.
Continue reading →
A filibuster in the Senate means making endless speeches and deploying other obstructive tactics to prevent a vote on a measure favored by the majority, and persisting in the chatter, hour after hour, day and night, until the majority abandons efforts to pass the measure.
Continue reading →
A new Republican majority in both Houses of Congress is gathering this month. It’s time to reaffirm some basic Republican principles and move ahead to achieve conservative goals in all three branches of government.
Continue reading →
Even if President Bush didn’t actually engineer Dr. Bill Frist’s election as Senate Majority Leader, this regime change is perceived as a major extension of the President’s power because of their close relationship.
Continue reading →
Alabama Chief Justice Roy S. Moore won his seat campaigning as the Ten Commandments Judge, and he has lived up to his billing.
Continue reading →
The clouds of election contests are behind us and a new Republican majority in both Houses of Congress will gather in January.
Continue reading →