How to Stop Judges Mischief about Marriage
he assault on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has already begun. A lawsuit claiming that the federal DOMA violates the U.S. Constitution was filed last month in federal district court in Miami, Florida. A similar case claiming that a state DOMA violates the U.S. Constitution is pending in federal district court in Nebraska, where a Clinton-appointed federal judge ruled on November 12, 2003 that the case has legal sufficiency to proceed to trial.
Continue reading →
Protect America from Judicial Tyranny
The Supremacists: The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop It is the title of my new book, to be published in July. This book refutes the two colossal myths propagated by the legal community for the last 50 years that “the Constitution is whatever the Supreme Court says it is” and that court rulings are “the law of the land.”
Continue reading →We Must Reject the Rule of Judges
The Constitution Restoration Act is the vehicle to restore the Separation of Powers designed by our great United States Constitution and to rid us of the un-American notion of judicial supremacy.
Continue reading →
Options For Dealing With Same-Sex Marriage Licenses
Congress overwhelmingly passed and President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996, and there it rested peacefully on the law books until this year.
Continue reading →Looking at Some 2004 Election Issues
Are there things about our country and our culture you want to change? Activist judges? Same-sex marriage? Protecting the Pledge of Allegiance? Political bias in universities? Public school curriculum? Taxes? Pornography on television?
Continue reading →Stopping The Mischief Of Activist Judges
Finally, we have a President who comes right out and targets “activist judges” as the enemy of traditional values and urges us to use “the constitutional process” to remedy the problem.
Continue reading →Will Massachusetts Abolish Marriage?
In a 4-3 decision released November 18, the court acknowledged that for three centuries Massachusetts defined civil marriage as stated in Black’s Law Dictionary: “the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.”
Continue reading →Marriage Must Be Protected from the Judges
Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →Why We Must Protect Marriage
Since the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriages in Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health, reporters have been asking presidential candidates for their comment.
Continue reading →It's Time To Rebuke The Judicial Oligarchy
Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →
Marriage Must Be Protected From The Judges
President Bush has proclaimed the week of October 12-18 as Marriage Protection Week because it’s becoming clearer all the time that the institution of marriage needs protection against battering by the courts.
Continue reading →Congress Should Stand Up and Be Counted
Federal court decisions banning the Pledge of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments, and the possibility raised in Lawrence v. Texas that marriage may no longer be defined as the union of a man and a woman, show that the time has come to curb the Imperial Judiciary.
Continue reading →Congress Should Stand Up And Be Counted
Federal court decisions about the Pledge of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments , and the specter raised in Lawrence v. Texas that marriage may no longer be defined as the union of a man and a woman, show that the time has come to curb the Imperial Judiciary.
Continue reading →The Hidden Meaning Of Marriage Tax Repeal
The marriage tax is not verbally expressed as policy in any statute but is buried in the numbers. It is a consequence of the fact that our income tax tables treat a married couple as only 1.67 persons instead of two whole persons.
Continue reading →Clinton Panders To The Feminists Again
President Clinton has just proved again why the feminists, during all those embarrassing months last year, continued to defend behavior that no sane woman would tolerate in a public official, a boss or a husband.
Continue reading →
77 Non-Religious Reasons to Support Man/Woman Marriage
by Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D.
