Not content with forcing colleges and universities to eliminate hundreds of male athletic teams, the radical feminists are now trying to persuade the Supreme Court to create a private cause of action so that activist judges can make personnel decisions about who should coach the teams.
Continue reading →
Time Magazine broke through the media silence about illegal aliens with a cover story on September 20 called “America’s Border: Who Left the Door Open?”
Continue reading →
Globalism doesn’t mean just accepting foreign countries’ products and people across our borders. Supreme Court justices are beginning to manifest a curious fascination with foreign legal systems, too.
Continue reading →Becoming more and more hysterical at the possibility of losing the presidential election, the liberals and their media allies are psyching up the public to expect legal challenges in any states that have close elections.
Continue reading →To find out what the two major parties stand for, we should be able to compare their Party Platforms adopted by their National Nominating Conventions in the summer of 2004.
Continue reading →The Republican and Democratic parties could have stirred up more television audience for their national nominating conventions by allowing the delegates to debate their party platforms.
Continue reading →The supervisors of the great Los Angeles County decided to turn tail and run rather than fight a lawsuit threatened by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Why such weak-kneed response?
Continue reading →A Clinton-appointed activist judge has wrapped the First Amendment around video and computer games that teach teenagers to kill policemen.
Continue reading →The 2004 national convention of the National Education Association adopted its usual leftwing legislative goals, giving the green light to the NEA’s highly paid staff to lobby the Congress that will convene in January 2005.
Continue reading →by Phyllis Schlafly The principal speakers at the Democratic National Convention conspicuously omitted one topic: the courts. The speakers didn’t talk about what kind of judges John Kerry would appoint, or how his choices might affect future decisions, or why the Democrats blocked George W. Bush’s appointments. This silence about the courts is especially odd
Continue reading →The handover of power to Iraq by the victorious American forces has stimulated public discussion about a word that seems to have fallen in disfavor in the last few years: sovereignty. That means the ability of a government to act without being subject to the legal control of another country or international organization, restrained only by moral principles.
Continue reading →The people who want to dissolve or diminish American sovereignty and replace it with global governance never give up.
Continue reading →Are there things about our country and our culture you want to change? Activist judges? Same-sex marriage? Protecting the Pledge of Allegiance? Political bias in universities? Public school curriculum? Taxes? Pornography on television?
Continue reading →Finally, we have a President who comes right out and targets “activist judges” as the enemy of traditional values and urges us to use “the constitutional process” to remedy the problem.
Continue reading →Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge’s shocking words were a broadside attack on current law: “We have to come to grips with the presence of 8 to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal status some way.”
Continue reading →The Bush Administration tried to camouflage its 180-degree reversal of its tariffs on imported steel with happy talk about an improved economy and efficiency efforts by the domestic steel industry. But nobody’s fooled; the Bush Administration ceded control of U.S. trade policy to a bunch of bureaucrats in Geneva who meet and decide in secret, and from whose ukases there is no appeal.
Continue reading →Trade representatives from 34 Western Hemisphere countries (all except Cuba) are now gathering in Miami to take the next step to expand NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) into the hemisphere-wide Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).
Continue reading →Most Americans assume that the election of the House of Representatives is fairly based on the geographic distribution of our population.
Continue reading →The Bush Administration has just re-affirmed the Clintonian feminists’ Title IX outrages, which impose a gender quota-like system on college sports. The feminists are squealing with joy and the National Women’s Law Center calls it a “huge win” — for the feminists, of course. Bush is dreaming if he thinks they will ever reward him with their votes.
Continue reading →Should the United States permit Gen. Tommy R. Franks, head of the U.S. Central Command, to be prosecuted in a court in Belgium for alleged war crimes during the Iraq war?
Continue reading →Press and television channels have been filled for months about America’s responsibility to bring democracy to Iraq and other faraway nations that have no prior experience with self-government.
Continue reading →Why is President George W. Bush continuing policies that were initiated by Bill Clinton?
Continue reading →Gone are the days when academic freedom was the watchword of college campuses. Today, thought control is the dominant theology on campuses, often hiding behind the mantras of diversity and multiculturalism.
Continue reading →The election on November 5th is a very crucial election. The entire existence of our constitutional republic hangs in the balance. We have suffered a half century of activist/liberal court decisions that seriously threaten to undermine our Rule of Law.
Continue reading →