In a 4-3 decision released November 18, the court acknowledged that for three centuries Massachusetts defined civil marriage as stated in Black’s Law Dictionary: “the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.”
Continue reading →Since the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriages in Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health, reporters have been asking presidential candidates for their comment.
Continue reading →Will Massachusetts, the cradle of American liberty, let four lawyers don the robes of oligarchy, override the wishes of the majority of the people, usurp the powers of their elected representatives, and sabotage the institution of marriage?
Continue reading →
President Bush has proclaimed the week of October 12-18 as Marriage Protection Week because it’s becoming clearer all the time that the institution of marriage needs protection against battering by the courts.
Continue reading →Federal court decisions about the Pledge of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments , and the specter raised in Lawrence v. Texas that marriage may no longer be defined as the union of a man and a woman, show that the time has come to curb the Imperial Judiciary.
Continue reading →The marriage tax is not verbally expressed as policy in any statute but is buried in the numbers. It is a consequence of the fact that our income tax tables treat a married couple as only 1.67 persons instead of two whole persons.
Continue reading →