Climate Reparation Insurance
By Pat Carlson
Eagle Forum Environmental Chairman
June 12, 2015
The Bonn climate change conference is entering its final hours of negotiations and little has been accomplished to satisfy those nations who would be the recipients of any agreement carried forward to COP21 next December in Paris.
When developed nations fail to make commitments, developing nations push back with more and more outrageous demands claiming the guilty need to pay. Loss and Damage is one of those newer demands first introduced at COP16 in Cancun, Mexico.
The proposed new entitlement was debated for two years and then during COP19 in Warsaw, Poland in 2013, the Philippine Islands were hit by typhoon Haiyan. The fact this unfortunate tragedy happened during the COP gave this concept new life and the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) was created. Its purpose is to deal with persons who have suffered “loss and damage associated with the impacts of climate change, including extreme events and slow onset events.” This wording encompasses any and all weather events, not just severe unexpected weather.
Mitigation and adaptation already exist to compensate developing nations through technology transfer and the financing of projects for infrastructure at a yearly cost of $8 billion. The primary beneficiaries of these programs have been China, India and Brazil while smaller countries, especially small island states (SIS), have been passed over. SIS now see this as a golden opportunity to cash in, especially since loss and damage is intended to compensate persons not countries.
Two months ago the small island of Vanuatu was hit by tropical cyclone Pam. Immediately President Baldwin Lonsdale threatened a lawsuit against those he deemed guilty, the fossil fuel companies, in order to make a real case for the necessity of loss and damage.
It is claimed that a fundamental legal principle of international law, confirmed by the International Court of Justice, provides that states should not cause harm outside their jurisdiction and should respect the environment of other states and areas beyond their frontiers. Since current emissions are above the UNFCCC-determined safe levels and because of claimed historical cumulative emissions racked up over 50 years, developed countries will be forever blamed for causing climate consequences to developing nations.
Proponents of loss and damage believe this is an insurance policy with no expiration date. They also believe this is much more than just insurance, so it has been proposed the WIM be a stand-alone entity, dealing with “non-economic loss and damage“ such as climate change-induced migrants and displaced persons. The WIM would become a global welfare agency doling out housing and food.
Loss and damage is just one proposal of many in the document headed to Paris which brings the developed and developing nations to loggerheads.
The developing nations have developed an insatiable appetite for handouts. To those whom much is given, much is taken.